Wick Communications

Should we be reading faster?

In Reading on January 30, 2015 at 10:26 am

spritz-speedreading

Twice in the last week, really smart people have mentioned to me that they feel limited by how fast they are able to read, and that they are doing something about it. It made me wonder whether they are on to something we should all be thinking about.

Avi Tuschman is a political anthropologist and holds a doctorate from Stanford. He speaks seven languages and has written a widely regarded book called, “Our Political Nature.” Suffice to say, he thinks about language and words and learning a lot.

Avi mentioned to me that he has “given up” and turned to an application called Spritz. Perhaps you have heard of it. The idea is this: Traditionally, when you read a line of text, your eye skitters along from left to right, settling ever so briefly on each word in order to determine its meaning before moving on. (You may be able to pick up groups of words, but the idea is the same. Start and stop, start and stop.) Spritz says when we do this we are looking for the “optimal recognition point” – some place in the heart of the word that allows us to nearly instantaneously determine its meaning.

The trouble is all that eye movement, according to Spritz.

If you are like me, you probably read about 300 words a minute, give or take. Spritz claims it can improve that markedly by moving the words for you and highlighting the OPR in red. It’s difficult to explain but easy to understand once you try it yourself. And you can test yourself for free here.

The struggle to read faster is probably as old as the printed word. When I was a kid, my dad taught Evelyn Wood Speed Reading. He was essentially a salesman trying to lure readers into hotel suites where he would sell the package. It worked, but it took practice and I wasn’t a practicer.

I think it’s possible something like Spritz could revolutionize the way we read on our mobile devices and that could be huge for producers of content. Most of us have called up a long story on our smartphone, tapped it, pinched the type to make it bigger, scrolled… and never made it to the bottom. What if you didn’t have to do any of that to read a 1,000-word New York Times story and were finished with it in three minutes?

The world of the word is changing.

Clay

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: